Socioeconomic status affects young people's experience of autonomy and outcomes. More autonomy for financially well off youth increased positive outcomes, but more autonomy for youth living in poverty caused higher deliquincy

Socioeconomic status

More guidance and structure may be beneficial for youth living in poverty.

Young men living in inner-city, lower-middle class neighborhoods are more likely to get farther in school if they have high levels of social competence. They are also more likely to end their relationships with peers who commit crimes and are less likely to commit crimes themselves.

Questions to consider: What are ways to find out from youth whether they are overwhelmed with too many decisions due to different life factors (for example socioeconomic status, family expectations.) or want to be more involved in decisions? How can our program address or work around barriers that may limit belonging (for example discrimination, poverty, racism, ableism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or ageism)? How can our program build social competence, especially of young men?